
Sign the petition
Durban Declaration Rebuttal
Commentary
17 August 2000
Nature 406, 673 (2000) © Macmillan Publishers Ltd.
Though HIV is the main cause of AIDS, other factors play a role
Sir Although I entirely endorse the stand taken by the authors of the
Durban Declaration1, I think that HIV is the principal, rather than the
sole, initiating factor of the current world pandemic of AIDS. I believe
this for the following reasons.
First, from my experience of secondary or acquired immune deficiency in
treated lymphoma patients who are HIV negative and in patients who have
chronic graft- versus-host disease after a transplant, HIV is not the only
mechanism for adults developing the clinical syndrome. Second, external
influences such as immune stimuli can modify progression, as demonstrated
when haemophiliacs given recombinant factor VIII have a slower loss of CD4
lymphocytes than those who receive immunogenic serum protein containing
factor VIII concentrates2. Third, poor nutritional status identified
on the basis of low vitamin A levels is associated with increased viral
shedding3. This augments HIV perinatal transmission rate in breastfeeding
African women4 and non-breastfeeding US women5. Fourth, general genital
hygiene6, underage sexual activity and circumcision7 all affect the risk of
acquiring HIV infection.
It is appalling that, as Dorritie states in Correspondence8, there may be a
right-wing political agenda behind the campaign claiming AIDS is not caused
by HIV. Nevertheless, other social factors are involved in the African
aspects of this epidemic, such as Johannesburg's high incidence of rape,
the myth that raping a virgin can cure AIDS, and the high level of non-HIV
sexually
transmitted diseases in sub-Saharan Africa9.
As a consequence, there are benefits to be gained from President Mbeki's
call for scientists to address the nature of AIDS and its links to HIV in
an African setting. Such an investigation could well conclude that
investments such as educating young men in the basics of sexual hygiene,
providing nutritional supplements for pregnant women and treating
mastitis10 might produce greater gains than spending money on antenatal
treatment with antiretroviral drugs.
R. T. D. Oliver
Department of Medical Oncology, Saint Bartholomew's Hospital, London
EC1A 7BE, UK
References
1.
Nature 406, 15-16 (2000).
2.
Hoot, K.& Canty, D. Haemophilia 4, 704-713 (1998).
3.
Mostad, S. B. et al. Lancet 350, 922-927 (1997).
4.
Semba, R. D. et al. Lancet 343, 1593-1597 (1994).
5.
Greenberg, B. L. et al. AIDS 11, 325-333 (1997).
6.
Beral, V. et al. Lancet 339, 632-635 (1992).
7.
Halperin, D. T.& Bailey, R. C. Lancet 354, 1813-1815 (1999).
8.
Dorritie, D. Nature 406, 13 (2000).
9.
Gerbase, A. C. et al. Lancet 351, 2-4 (1998).
10.
Semba, R. D. et al. J. Infect. Dis. 180, 93-98 (1999).
Nature © Macmillan Publishers Ltd 2000 Registered No. 785998
England.

TORONTO
tel/fax:(416) 406-HEAL

Webmaster: Robert Johnston
jaunts@mailcity.com