Health Education AIDS Liaison, Toronto

Hepatitis C

The idea that the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is an isolated virus proven responsible for the illnesses of the liver in those who test positive on a hepatitis C antibody test has been challenged. The criticisms run parallel to those raised about HIV and AIDS. Also, the same groups of people being diagnosed HIV positive are at risk of being diagnosed HCV positive as well. For these reason HEAL Toronto presents arguments against hepatitis C.

Is Hepatitis C Really a Virus?
ABCNEWS.com -- Second Opinion:
Nicholas Regush raises red flags about the legitimacy and origins of the supposed hepatitis C virus. Regush has been flooded with letters in response to his first two columns on hepatitis C, most lambasting him for questioning the mainstream view on the disease. (ABCNEWS.com)

Vapor Virus?
Even Good Researchers Sometimes Use Wrong Bait
No one's been able to come up with a hepatitis C virus, purify it, inject it into an animal and cause hepatitis.
Fishing for Viruses (Part2)
The illness known as hepatitis C definitely exists, but it has never been shown to be caused by a virus, suggests our columnist.
Hepatitis C Reconsidered (Part 3)
Old Research Raises Still-Valid Questions


Grass Roots Seeded by Drugmaker
By Robert O'Harrow Jr.
Washington Post Tuesday, September 12, 2000; Page A01
Showing all the signs of a thriving grass-roots movement, a host of new health-care groups are drawing attention to the perils of a contagious, sometimes lethal virus called hepatitis C. But contrary to appearances, these coalitions are not spontaneous gatherings of concerned citizens. They are instead a key part of a carefully orchestrated marketing campaign funded by Schering-Plough Corp. to sell the primary therapy for hepatitis C, Rebetron, which costs $18,000 a year

Slow Viruses: The Original Sin Against the Laws of Virology
By Peter H. Duesberg and Bryan J. Ellison
from INVENTING THE AIDS VIRUS, Regnery, 1996
Most virus hunters prefer chasing real, if arguably harmless, viruses as their deadly enemies. But Gajdusek's "unconventional" viruses - the ones neither he nor anyone else have ever found - have been making a comeback in recent years. Given the abundance of research dollars being poured into biomedical science by the NIH and other agencies, opportunistic virus hunters have been finding creative ways to cash in. One increasingly successful method utilizes modern biotechnology to isolate viruses that may not even exist.
For their comments on hepatitis C: Phantom Viruses and Big Bucks

Latent Viruses and Mutated Oncogenes:
No Evidence for Pathogenicity

Peter H. Duesberg and Jody R. Schwartz
Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology 43:135-204, 1992
The scientific community has been virtually unanimous in admiring its recent triumphs in biotechnology - above all, the detection and amplification of minute amounts of materials into workable and marketable products. However, in clinical diagnostic applications, the new detection methods have become a mixed blessing, which benefits medical scientists but not necessarily their clients. Since rare signals have become just as detectable as abundant ones, many latent viruses have been detected and have been assumed to be just as pathogenic as active prototypes (1-3). Likewise, cellular mutations have become detectable that do not, or just barely, affect the function and activity of genes. Yet when the affected genes are structurally related to retroviral oncogenes, they are assumed to be just as oncogenic as highly active retroviral oncogenes (1, 4-8). However, the evidence for these hypotheses is only circumstantial-based on structural similarities to classical pathogenic viruses and viral oncogenes. Thus, without direct proof, these hypotheses may open the doors to psychologically harmful prognoses and clinically harmful prevention programs, termed "molecular genetics at the bedside" by Bishop (9)

"Circumstantial evidence is a very tricky thing," answered Holmes, thoughtfully. "It may seem to point very straight to one thing, but if you shift your point of view a little, you may find it pointing in an equally uncompromising manner to something entirely different.... There is nothing more deceptive than an obvious fact...."

- Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, in The Boscombe Valley Mystery, 1928

For their comments on hepatitis C go here

Hepatitis C field the land of "I don't know".
Jon Cohen, Science reporter and defender of the AIDS orthodoxy, suffered a spell of HIV related deja vu at the recent NIH hepatitis C conference. Says Cohen: "HIV holds up an interesting mirror to the young HCV field, where "I don't know" remains the most common answer to a question." "Like their counterparts studying AIDS in the early 1980s, HCV researchers still can't grow the virus in laboratory cultures, and they don't know precisely how it infects a cell. They also have but foggy notions about the timeline between infection and illness, the so-called "natural history" of the disease. Currently available drugs, like early AIDS therapies, have serious toxicities and fail in most people--and no one knows for sure why some people respond to treatment and others do not. Nor have vaccines lived up to early hopes; just like HIV, HCV mutates rapidly, creating a swarm of different viruses in each infected person that can thwart antibodies easily."
For anyone who has finds that the HIV=AIDS equation doesn't add up it shouldn't be hard to read between the lines. They've spotted another Bigfoot out there in the woods.

The Scientific Challenge of Hepatitis C.
Jon Cohen
Science 1999 285: 26-30. (in News Focus)
Public Health Effort Unwittingly Spread HCV.
Jon Cohen
Science 1999 285: 27. (in News Focus)
Chiron Stakes Out Its Territory.
Jon Cohen
Science 1999 285: 28. (in News Focus)




HEAL
TORONTO

tel/fax:(416) 778-4207

INDEX

Search our web site (400+ pages)
    
  Site search Web search   search tips